Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Sunscreens (but were too afraid to ask)

This article explains what to look for when choosing a sunscreen, and steps you can take to maximise your sun protection. If you live in Australia, your risk of skin cancer is high. Regular use of sunscreen should be a habit for every Australian.   Source: Sunscreen sense

TGA Issues Guidance on Sunscreen Manufacturing

In Australia, many sunscreens are regulated as therapeutic goods because of their important role addressing public health issues. Sunscreens that are regulated as therapeutic goods under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 are referred to as 'therapeutic sunscreens'. Included in this category are: primary sunscreens with SPF 4 or more; secondary sunscreens - except those regulated as cosmetics; primary or secondary sunscreens with SPF 4 or more that contain an insect repellent; and, sunscreens with SPF less than 4 that are exempt from being listed under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 because they come within an exemption.    Source: Manufacturing sunscreens

NICNAS Announces New Fees Effective From 1 August 2019

The National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS) regulates the use of all industrial chemicals including those used in cosmetics. The full costs of administering NICNAS are recovered through fees and charges paid by industrial chemical importers and manufacturers. New fees starting on 1st August 2019 can be found here: NICNAS new fees

Reminder: NICNAS to be Replaced by AICIS

Far reaching legislative changes are underway in relation to the regulation of industrial chemicals in Australia. A new regulatory scheme, the Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS), is being implemented. AICIS will replace and simplify the current National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS). AICIS will commence on 1 July 2020. On the same date, a ban will commence on the use of new animal test data for ingredients which are only used in cosmetics.   Source: AICIS to replace NICNAS

Court Finds Kimberly-Clark Did Not Mislead Consumers with 'Flushable' Claims

The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) had alleged that in describing its products as ‘flushable’ on product packaging and its website, Kimberly-Clark had misled consumers about the suitability of its wipes to be flushed down the toilet. However, the Court found that Kimberly-Clark’s claims were not false or misleading. The Court ruled there was insufficient evidence to show that Kleenex Cottonelle ‘flushable’ wipes in this case, as opposed to ‘wipes’ products more broadly, had contributed to the problems in municipal sewerage systems. The Court noted that Kimberly-Clark did not expect its wipes to fully disperse in the sewerage system and that Kimberly Clark’s wipes had inferior properties of breakdown and dispersion than toilet paper. The Court noted this was consistent with a conclusion the wipes posed a risk of harm to the sewerage system but there was insufficient evidence this harm actually occurred, except in limited circumstances.   Source: Flushable wipes tested

Unilever All in a Sweat Over New Player's 'Clinical' Efficacy Claims

The Federal Court recently examined whether representations alleged by Unilever to have been made by Beiersdorf about Beiersdorf’s Nivea ‘Stress Protect Clinical Strength’ deodorant were false, misleading or deceptive under the Australian Consumer Law. Whilst Unilever was ultimately unsuccessful, the case provides useful guidance on the use of the term ‘clinical’ as a product descriptor and what sort of scientific substantiation is required to support a ‘clinical’ claim. Unilever has appealed the decision!    Source: Laura Hartley & Sarah Best, Addison’s Lawyers 'Clinical' efficacy test


our Sydney office:

Robert Forbes - Director
+61 2 9660 8027

Ellie Kim - Regulatory Affairs Manager
+61 450 533 129

RFA Breaking News

Complementary Medicines and Medical Devices

  TGA Publishes More Information About Medicine Formulations To improve access to important medicine information, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) now publishes additional formulation details of medicines and biological products…



  Aussie Company in Deep Yoghurt for Failing to Disclose Ingredient The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has recently issued an infringement notice and penalty of AUD$12,600 to Queensland…


Cosmetics and TGA Listed Sunscreens

  NICNAS to AICIS Education Program To help understand and comply with obligations under the new industrial chemicals laws that take effect from 1 July 2020, NICNAS has compiled a…



  Failing Food Report – February 2020 These latest reports detail food that was found to fail under the Imported Food Inspection Scheme during the month of February. Among the…


Cosmetics and TGA Listed Sunscreens

  Reminder: NICNAS Turns into AICIS on 1 July 2020 – Training Videos Available Regular readers of this newsletter will be aware that the regulation of the chemical ingredients used…


Marketing News:

  Training: RFA Provides Comprehensive Training in Regulatory Affairs Are you looking to expand your knowledge or are you new to Australian regulations related to the supply of foods, cosmetics…


Go to top